Started By
Message

I posted this earlier in the year
Posted on 12/24/12 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 12/24/12 at 4:37 pm
But now that the season is over I will ask this question again. What recruit(s) do you believe will get an extra star?
I am going with Sherrils and Rhodes. I still think Rhodes would look good as a big SEC DE but we are thin on the OL.
I am going with Sherrils and Rhodes. I still think Rhodes would look good as a big SEC DE but we are thin on the OL.
Posted on 12/24/12 at 4:40 pm to outlawjoseywales
I think Beisel would have, but as I understand it he didn't play this year bc of an injury. I could be wrong.
Posted on 12/26/12 at 9:02 am to outlawjoseywales
Rhodes has the highest chance, since most star ratings are based off of scholarship offers and his list is impressive.
I think Sherrils is also deserving (ESPN has him at 4 stars), but he has the same problem as Penton and Burkett. They project as Division 1 players because of athletic abiblity. They are guys who would look great at a combine, but play inferior competition in high school. Unless they go down south for some football camps they are stuck where they are.
Their best chance of getting an extra star is to open up their recruitment and start getting their numbers clocked at events. I'd rather they just stay at 3 stars and stay committed.
I think Sherrils is also deserving (ESPN has him at 4 stars), but he has the same problem as Penton and Burkett. They project as Division 1 players because of athletic abiblity. They are guys who would look great at a combine, but play inferior competition in high school. Unless they go down south for some football camps they are stuck where they are.
Their best chance of getting an extra star is to open up their recruitment and start getting their numbers clocked at events. I'd rather they just stay at 3 stars and stay committed.
Posted on 12/26/12 at 11:24 am to mograyback
Beisel played about half of the year
Popular
Back to top
