Started By
Message
re: SEC officials: penalty should have been called on Dial
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:37 pm to Rebelgator
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:37 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
"shite, we got caught, but look they're doing it too. Two wrongs make a right.... etc"
Didn't say that. But if they're gonna dish punishment after the fact, do it all the way. If you got players gouging at eyes, that was missed and there's video evidence, enforce a penalty after the fact there too.
If the SEC decides to sit him or whatever, it's their choice and decision. I think Bama will be ok without him if it comes down to it. Got a month to prepare without him if need be. Just amazed at how womenlike folks are for a clean hit between the numbers of someone moving towards the runner.
2
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:43 pm to Alahunter
quote:
But if they're gonna dish punishment after the fact, do it all the way. If you got players gouging at eyes, that was missed and there's video evidence,
I'd imagine that won't get glossed over. Hell, we were shocked when Elston got suspended earlier in the year. No flag on that play.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:53 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Just amazed at how womenlike folks are for a clean hit between the numbers of someone moving towards the runner.
If it's clean why did the SEC officials say it was a penalty after the fact? Serious question. Is there an issue with the rules interpretation on the part of your officials?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News