Started By
Message

re: SEC officials: penalty should have been called on Dial

Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:34 pm to
Posted by LSUdm21
Member since Nov 2008
17486 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Someone explain to me how Murray was defenseless


That's not the argument. It's clear that Murray was targeted for a knockout shot. Dial's helmet hit him in the jaw.
Posted by sarc
Member since Mar 2011
9997 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

That's not the argument. It's clear that Murray was targeted for a knockout shot. Dial's helmet hit him in the jaw


Actually, it is the arguement. There's a growing misconception that H2H contact is always a penalty. Not so.

From the article:
quote:

By rule, you can't hit a defenseless player above the shoulders," Shaw said. "What the determination needs to be is was this a defenseless player and was contact initiated above the shoulders? When we go through video review of it, that's what we'll have to determine. And then you as you break it down, did he lead with the head or lead with the shoulder? From game action, it was a personal foul regardless of how we break it down frame by frame."


Again, how was Murray defenseless?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter