Started By
Message

re: Aggies and Mizzou fans: Differences between the SEC & Big 12

Posted on 11/6/12 at 8:26 am to
Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 11/6/12 at 8:26 am to
quote:

Texas fans are arrogant in ways that Bama fans could only dream of.




now that says it all right there.
Posted by aggressor
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2011
8718 posts
Posted on 11/6/12 at 9:25 am to
quote:

quote:
Texas fans are arrogant in ways that Bama fans could only dream of.




now that says it all right there.


Some recent examples of how bad they have gotten now that A&M isn't there to hold them in check:

Mack Brown at his PC this week said that people doing the "horns down" is disrespectful and all but called of a banning of the practice (as if that is possible).

Texas wants to have the Thanksgiving game with A&M to be replaced with a rotation of other Big 12 Teams, just to make sure that the game is always a Texas home game ala the Dallas Cowboys.

When you hear quotes about what is going on with the conference decision wise, it is just as likely the quotes will come from DeLoss Dodds directly as the B12 Commish, they don't even try to pretend he is more than a puppet anymore.

All High School Games in Texas are administered by the "University Interscholastic League" which is actually a branch of Texas. For the most part this has no effect but one of their schemes with the LHN was not only to broadcast HS games but to use the UIL to drop their contracts with other networks and have all HS Championship games on the LHN.

Bama fans are arrogant and obviously they have the most pull with the SEC offices in a lot of ways but they don't have real control and they always put the conference first. Texas doesn't even try to hide that the only purpose of the Big 12 is to serve them and that all schools should bow down and be thankful that Texas allows them to bask in their glow. A lot of Texas fans truly thought that A&M would fall into obscurity and never recover if we were unable to play them every year.

Of course the real difference is Bama has actually won a lot of NC's and truly been dominant. Texas has 3 legit NC's, 3. The 1970 NC they claim is a UPI Title which didn't include bowl games as Texas went on to get destroyed by Notre Dame in the Cotton Bowl. Sure Bama claims some questionable ones but they still have a truckload of legit titles. Almost all of Texas' real success comes from the era of no scholarship limitations when most of the SWC had half the scholarships Texas did. A lot of Texas fans honestly didn't understand why we wanted to go SEC as well because it was "too hard". It just doesn't compute to them that you would play a schedule that has more than a few schools that are several notches below you resource wise to assure yourself of an easy 8-9 wins.

I freaking hate those arrogant assholes. They despise fair fights and truly believe their shite doesn't stink.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter