Started By
Message
re: Bama Rbs vs LSU Rbs
Posted on 11/5/12 at 3:52 pm to gatordmb89
Posted on 11/5/12 at 3:52 pm to gatordmb89
quote:
gatordmb89
Your opinion made no sense, and frankly seems to be the opposite of what most people here (even a large majority of bama fans observed Sat night).
I see no reason to say Lacy is better than all of LSU's RBs. Like someone said, Lacy doesn't appear to have the quickness he had pre-injury. Maybe if he still had those quicks Sat night I would have a different opinion, but that wasn't the case. He is a big strong back that is very capable of running into a hole formed by Bama's top notch o-line. Hill was making things happen when those holes weren't there, and when they were.
Stats alone don't tell the whole story to a RB, you have numerous factors that make direct comparison in stats pointless... # of carries, what formation did his carries come from?, how good is his o-line?, how good is the oppositions Defensive front 7?
Posted on 11/5/12 at 4:25 pm to LSUnation78
quote:
I see no reason to say Lacy is better than all of LSU's RBs. Like someone said, Lacy doesn't appear to have the quickness he had pre-injury. Maybe if he still had those quicks Sat night I would have a different opinion, but that wasn't the case. He is a big strong back that is very capable of running into a hole formed by Bama's top notch o-line. Hill was making things happen when those holes weren't there, and when they were
I'm agreeing that Hill is better than Lacy, but Lacy had several spin moves and several plays he got significant yards after contact Saturday. I don't think saying he can only run through a hole is at all accurate.
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)