Started By
Message

re: Should Bama be the preseason Number 1 for 2013?

Posted on 10/1/12 at 9:05 pm to
Posted by LSU1NSEC
Member since Sep 2007
17243 posts
Posted on 10/1/12 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

Come on, you're better than that tired argument.


Bama didn't win SEC West or SEC and tied LSU 1-1. Bama delusion notwithstanding, those are the facts.
Posted by Shiner Bock Aggie
1985
Member since Aug 2008
517 posts
Posted on 10/1/12 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

Bama didn't win SEC West or SEC and tied LSU 1-1. Bama delusion notwithstanding, those are the facts.


I don't know if you are trying to dispute that Bama should not be preseason number 1 or should not be the 2011 BCS Champ.

Either way LSU had a great team, but is not the champ according to the rules.
Posted by dedfella
Ms
Member since Aug 2011
3953 posts
Posted on 10/1/12 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

Bama didn't win SEC West or SEC and tied LSU 1-1. Bama delusion notwithstanding, those are the facts.


This isn't very Gumpish of you. In this thread a non-gump is gumping and allowing others to gump. Why you no wanna gump?
Posted by BlackPawnMartyr
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2010
15343 posts
Posted on 10/1/12 at 9:15 pm to
quote:

Bama didn't win SEC West or SEC


LOL gotta love how stupid these idiots are that point out that Bama didnt win the west nor the SEC in the same sentence. :facepalm:
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter