Started By
Message
re: Video proof of refs gettin' paid by the REC, yo.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 12:52 am to OMLandshark
Posted on 9/30/12 at 12:52 am to OMLandshark
lol...explain to me the "interception" by ole miss, then?
Lester's foot was out of bounds and the ruling on field was Bama's ball, player stepped out...yet it was reviewed and overturned despite there being zero evidence otherwise.
sometimes a play just doesn't go the way you think it should have, but I highly doubt a ref would try to openly cheat knowing that there's probably a half dozen tv cameras showing what he's doing live with plenty of people just looking for crap like this so they can claim cheating.
Take the tin-foil hat off.
Lester's foot was out of bounds and the ruling on field was Bama's ball, player stepped out...yet it was reviewed and overturned despite there being zero evidence otherwise.
sometimes a play just doesn't go the way you think it should have, but I highly doubt a ref would try to openly cheat knowing that there's probably a half dozen tv cameras showing what he's doing live with plenty of people just looking for crap like this so they can claim cheating.
Take the tin-foil hat off.
3
Posted on 9/30/12 at 12:54 am to ChoadieMcSmalls
quote:
lol...explain to me the "interception" by ole miss, then?
Lester's foot was out of bounds and the ruling on field was Bama's ball, player stepped out...yet it was reviewed and overturned despite there being zero evidence otherwise.
Because it was the correct call. Something shocking for Bama to be called out on their bullshite, I know, but most teams tend to experience this regularly.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 12:56 am to ChoadieMcSmalls
I didn't think either the touchdown or the fumble on the interception should have been overturned because there was no evidence.
did you miss the youtube clip at the beginning of this thread?
quote:
but I highly doubt a ref would try to openly cheat knowing that there's probably a half dozen tv cameras showing what he's doing
did you miss the youtube clip at the beginning of this thread?
Posted on 9/30/12 at 1:09 am to ChoadieMcSmalls
quote:
lol...explain to me the "interception" by ole miss, then?
Lester's foot was out of bounds and the ruling on field was Bama's ball, player stepped out...yet it was reviewed and overturned despite there being zero evidence otherwise.
sometimes a play just doesn't go the way you think it should have, but I highly doubt a ref would try to openly cheat knowing that there's probably a half dozen tv cameras showing what he's doing live with plenty of people just looking for crap like this so they can claim cheating.
Take the tin-foil hat off.
Also, the Ole Miss player that actually stripped the ball was out of bounds when he stripped it. This by rule should make the ball out of bounds but wasnt called. Bottom line, bama should have gotten to keep the possession.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News