quote:
I agree. If you research 1925, that one is perfectly legit. That Rose Bowl is also the reason Southern football began to be taken seriously. Other SEC fans should acknowledge our 1925 NC if they understand the development of the game

A rose bowl win is just that. A rose bowl win. You can't start a poll in 1935 and award titles from the early to mid 20's. Come on

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by cyde

He gone

Member since Nov 2005

31793 posts

Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:12 am to Rickdaddy4188

quote:
A rose bowl win is just that. A rose bowl win. You can't start a poll in 1935 and award titles from the early to mid 20's. Come on

I think the point is that the meaning of bowls and post-season progress has changed and evolved over the last 100 years.

I mean, come on. 1925 isn't even in what's considered the "modern era" of college football (generally accepted to have started around 1950). You can't apply today's standards to a game which wasn't even the same almost 90 years ago, dude, and you know it.

Either way, the agenda of your posts is pretty clear.

This post was edited on 9/25/12 at 12:13 am

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by TwoBarBammer

Member since Jul 2012

421 posts

Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:14 am to Rickdaddy4188

quote:
Rickdaddy4188

I picture you actually looking like your avatar because you certainly are dumb enough.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by genro

Member since Nov 2011

61788 posts

Posted on 9/25/12 at 12:16 am to Rickdaddy4188

quote:
A rose bowl win is just that. A rose bowl win.

Oh please. Washington was undefeated, and considered far and away the best team in the country. Bama was undefeated, and beat them.

1925 National Champs!