Started By
Message
re: What's the spat between Chizik and VanGorder?
Posted on 9/21/12 at 9:22 am to Lg
Posted on 9/21/12 at 9:22 am to Lg
quote:Too much speculation - shite like this is trivial when your team is fielding a defense that is putrid.
I never thought it had anything to do with Dye. My thought is, that Chizik had Bolt in the meetings since he couldn't be in there to report to him what was said in the meeting. Now if BVG had a problem with him being in the meeting, why wouldn't he tell the HC he didn't want him in there?
Honestly, how the hell did this rumored "incident" get leaked to the public?
3
Posted on 9/21/12 at 9:23 am to RT1941
Why does Chizik need someone to report what is said in a meeting. Why not just ask BVG himself?
Posted on 9/21/12 at 9:24 am to RT1941
quote:
Honestly, how the hell did this rumored "incident" get leaked to the public?
More bad publicity is about to come out...we've overused the trees as a diversion. This is our new plan
Posted on 9/21/12 at 9:26 am to RT1941
quote:
Honestly, how the hell did this rumored "incident" get leaked to the public?
The guy from AU247 must have reported it. Can't remember the guy's name but I heard him talking about it on Fbaum yesterday. Remember, this came from AU not PF. His speculation was that BVG wanted to speak candidly about some things going on and didn't want it getting back to Chizik.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News