Started By
Message

Bama teaches Aggy how to count Championships
Posted on 8/25/12 at 7:20 am
Posted on 8/25/12 at 7:20 am
Apparently aTm has magically won an additional 2 MNC in football. I thought the move to the SEC would make it harder for them to win championships, I was clearly wrong.
Posted on 8/25/12 at 7:24 am to UT755LN
Congrats to aTm imo, fwiw, tbh.
Posted on 8/25/12 at 7:27 am to Teague
quote:Amused. Going from 1 recognized championship to 3 is impressive.
Jealous?
Posted on 8/25/12 at 7:31 am to UT755LN
Bama fans can't differntiate between fictional and real championships, nor exhibition games.
Posted on 8/25/12 at 7:36 am to long4life
LSU doesn't have many to count, therefore they don't want anyone else to count their own.
Posted on 8/25/12 at 7:37 am to long4life
quote:The last BCS game kinda looked like all three. fwiw
fictional and real championships, nor exhibition games.
Posted on 8/25/12 at 7:42 am to Teague
quote:The topic at hand is Aggy creating fictional national championships. I've seen Bama and LSU win more MNCs in the last decade then Aggy has won in the last 100 years...
LSU doesn't have many to count, therefore they don't want anyone else to count their own.
Posted on 8/25/12 at 7:44 am to UT755LN
quote:
The topic at hand is
The topic at hand is whatever direction in which I decide to hijack your pussified, Big12, whiney-arse thread.
Posted on 8/25/12 at 7:46 am to long4life
quote:
Bama fans can't differntiate between fictional and real championships, nor exhibition games.
Nor can LSU fans regarding who deserves to be in BCSNCGs opposite LSU.
Posted on 8/25/12 at 7:48 am to UT755LN
Well, 1919 and 1939 are solidly legit. Not sure what the 3rd one is, but I'm going to give them the benefit of the doubt.
Posted on 8/25/12 at 7:50 am to bamascott2
The real topic at hand is why a horn posts on an SEC message board trolling aggies if we aren't a rival anyway, and WVU and TCU were an upgrade.
I smell agsessed..
I smell agsessed..
Posted on 8/25/12 at 7:51 am to Evolved Simian
I believe 1920 was in scored upon as well.
Yes those years are irrelevant in today's game but is others start claiming MNCs why shouldn't we?
Yes those years are irrelevant in today's game but is others start claiming MNCs why shouldn't we?
Posted on 8/25/12 at 7:53 am to UT755LN
Posted on 8/25/12 at 7:54 am to UT755LN
With all the Texas hype, it's surprising they've only won three AP titles themselves.
Posted on 8/25/12 at 8:00 am to Sig
quote:
The real topic at hand is why a horn posts on an SEC message board trolling aggies if we aren't a rival anyway, and WVU and TCU were an upgrade.
I smell agsessed..
This.
Posted on 8/25/12 at 8:03 am to UT755LN
quote:
UT755LN
Maybe you should head back over to shaggy bevo and whine about something else. No one here cares.

Posted on 8/25/12 at 8:05 am to UT755LN
quote:
The topic at hand is Aggy creating fictional national championships.
Last time I checked, when you go undefeated and unscored upon like the 1917 and 1919 teams did, you're the National Champion.
When you LOSE YOUR BOWL GAME (like your school did in the 1970 season), you're not.
I'd say your 1970 National Championship is far more fictional than our 3.
Posted on 8/25/12 at 8:06 am to bamascott2
quote:
think they've underclaimed, FWIW
quote:
5 1976 10-2-0 Bob Kirlin
Sure, why not.

Popular
Back to top
