Started By
Message

re: If Penn State Scandal occurred in the SEC , would we support a ban?

Posted on 7/13/12 at 1:43 pm to
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25348 posts
Posted on 7/13/12 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

Also, you didn't answer either of my questions. Being honest, did you actually read the rule book before posting that rule or just Emmert's letter?


Yes I googled "NCAA ethics" went to the guidebook, available in pdf. Searched it. Read sections 10 and 11. Determined it was a basis for saying a violation of the code of ethics existed. Edited a previous post. Went to lunch. Came back and saw the poster who linked the letter. Read your post which misstated what the rule says. Refuted your disingenuous argument and undue snarkiness. Now I am answering a question to which the answer is immaterial because you are stubbornly being an arse about it. Give up the ghost. It is a basis and the president of the NCAA has already taken that position. Further since you already agreed that state bar associations and other professional licensing entities have a right and an obligation to act regarding crimes that are unrelated or tangentially related to the area of conduct they govern, QED.

Further still, The letter actually outlines other more pertinent sections of the rule book that I would have quoted had I seen it before it was posted by Tiguar.
This post was edited on 7/13/12 at 1:48 pm
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54193 posts
Posted on 7/13/12 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Read your post which misstated what the rule says.
It did not.

quote:

Refuted your disingenuous argument
Argument is legit.

quote:

It is a basis and the president of the NCAA has already taken that position.
It is, but the NCAA has to take a very broad reading of its rule books if it wants to act.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter