Started By
Message
re: If Penn State Scandal occurred in the SEC , would we support a ban?
Posted on 7/13/12 at 1:43 pm to WDE24
Posted on 7/13/12 at 1:43 pm to WDE24
quote:
Also, you didn't answer either of my questions. Being honest, did you actually read the rule book before posting that rule or just Emmert's letter?
Yes I googled "NCAA ethics" went to the guidebook, available in pdf. Searched it. Read sections 10 and 11. Determined it was a basis for saying a violation of the code of ethics existed. Edited a previous post. Went to lunch. Came back and saw the poster who linked the letter. Read your post which misstated what the rule says. Refuted your disingenuous argument and undue snarkiness. Now I am answering a question to which the answer is immaterial because you are stubbornly being an arse about it. Give up the ghost. It is a basis and the president of the NCAA has already taken that position. Further since you already agreed that state bar associations and other professional licensing entities have a right and an obligation to act regarding crimes that are unrelated or tangentially related to the area of conduct they govern, QED.
Further still, The letter actually outlines other more pertinent sections of the rule book that I would have quoted had I seen it before it was posted by Tiguar.
This post was edited on 7/13/12 at 1:48 pm
Posted on 7/13/12 at 1:49 pm to therick711
quote:It did not.
Read your post which misstated what the rule says.
quote:Argument is legit.
Refuted your disingenuous argument
quote:It is, but the NCAA has to take a very broad reading of its rule books if it wants to act.
It is a basis and the president of the NCAA has already taken that position.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)