Started By
Message
re: If Penn State Scandal occurred in the SEC , would we support a ban?
Posted on 7/13/12 at 1:36 pm to therick711
Posted on 7/13/12 at 1:36 pm to therick711
quote:No, I am not. I have been pretty consistent.
You are back tracking:
quote:No, I said the rules don't really cover this unless you want to include the general statement. Which is true.
You disingenuously in attempt to mock me looked at the ennumerated list to determine that it wasn't applicable without reviewing or intentionally omitting this:
Also, you didn't answer either of my questions. Being honest, did you actually read the rule book before posting that rule or just Emmert's letter?
quote:If you read the rule book (which I did) and Emmert's letter, you see that even Emmert has to acknowledge the stretch being made. Sure, he can do it because the rule is vague enough, but a fair reading of the rule book would not encompass covering this incident. Which, frankly, isn't surprising because who would ever have considered something like this could happen.
Just admit that I read it broader than you did (assuming you even read it all) and Emmert agrees with me.
1
Posted on 7/13/12 at 1:43 pm to WDE24
quote:
Also, you didn't answer either of my questions. Being honest, did you actually read the rule book before posting that rule or just Emmert's letter?
Yes I googled "NCAA ethics" went to the guidebook, available in pdf. Searched it. Read sections 10 and 11. Determined it was a basis for saying a violation of the code of ethics existed. Edited a previous post. Went to lunch. Came back and saw the poster who linked the letter. Read your post which misstated what the rule says. Refuted your disingenuous argument and undue snarkiness. Now I am answering a question to which the answer is immaterial because you are stubbornly being an arse about it. Give up the ghost. It is a basis and the president of the NCAA has already taken that position. Further since you already agreed that state bar associations and other professional licensing entities have a right and an obligation to act regarding crimes that are unrelated or tangentially related to the area of conduct they govern, QED.
Further still, The letter actually outlines other more pertinent sections of the rule book that I would have quoted had I seen it before it was posted by Tiguar.
This post was edited on 7/13/12 at 1:48 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News