I did not intentionally leave it out. Go to the rule book, not the NCAA letter and read that section. It is clear it wasn't intended to cover this type situation. I acknowledge that the NCAA could use a broad interpretation to act if they so choose.

Now be honest, you read Emmert's letter not the bylaws didn't you?

This post was edited on 7/13/12 at 1:22 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by therick711

South

Member since Jan 2008

25348 posts

Posted on 7/13/12 at 1:23 pm to WDE24

You are back tracking:

I focused on the duties imposed by this:

quote:
Individuals employed by (or associated with) a member institution to administer, conduct or coach intercollegiate athletics and all participating student-athletes shall act with honesty and sportsmanship at all times so that intercollegiate athletics as a whole, their institutions and they, as individuals, shall represent the honor and dignity of fair play and the generally recognized high standards associated with wholesome competitive sports.

You disingenuously in attempt to mock me looked at the ennumerated list to determine that it wasn't applicable without reviewing or intentionally omitting this:

quote:
Unethical conduct by a prospective or enrolled student-athlete or a current or former institutional staff member
(e.g., coach, professor, tutor, teaching assistant, student manager, student trainer) may include, but is not limited
to, the following:

Just admit that I read it broader than you did (assuming you even read it all) and Emmert agrees with me. You trying to defend being unduly snarky to someone that has shown you respect in this debate is pretty sad.

This post was edited on 7/13/12 at 1:26 pm

1 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board