Started By
Message
4
Posted on 6/28/12 at 11:52 pm to Tigerdew
Tigerdew - I understand your comment. Mett has never played poorly (or spectacularly) I am just wondering if given the choice, whether it would be worth the risk?
Posted on 7/2/12 at 10:47 am to Tigerdew
This is a tough question for people to really grasp IMO... My 100% non-homer UNbiased answer is AJ without a doubt. Mett is unproven, you can talk potential all you want but AJ has just as much potential at 6'4 215lbs. Mett will not have the mobility of AJ either (neither are great). He has not been the field general of a National Championship winning team (not flaming). Mett could be a beast but i've got to take a "for sure" 7 over a "could be" 9. JMO..
It's like when your school signs a new 5* recruit, a lot of times we go crazy and automatically think this person will step in and walk into a starting role and (most of the time) that is just not the case. Experience is huge in college, especially at the QB position.
It's like when your school signs a new 5* recruit, a lot of times we go crazy and automatically think this person will step in and walk into a starting role and (most of the time) that is just not the case. Experience is huge in college, especially at the QB position.
Posted on 7/2/12 at 2:34 pm to Tigerdew
quote:
I didn't realize Mett played so poorly.
Yea, he looked terrible on the bench.
Posted on 7/2/12 at 7:49 pm to Tigerdew
i can't believe this is a consideration - mett over aj.
The responses give proof that most people who choose mett are always going to work for someone else and top out at $14 an hour.
The responses give proof that most people who choose mett are always going to work for someone else and top out at $14 an hour.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News