Started By
Message
Had we a 4-team playoff last season, LSU would have had 2 rematches
Posted on 6/27/12 at 10:49 am
Posted on 6/27/12 at 10:49 am
Yaaay
#1 LSU vs #4 Oregon
#2 Bama vs #3 Okie Lite
#1 LSU vs #4 Oregon
#2 Bama vs #3 Okie Lite
15
Posted on 6/27/12 at 10:51 am to Roaad
Posted on 6/27/12 at 10:52 am to hawgndodge
OU gets the nod for beating them and winning conference.
Posted on 6/27/12 at 10:52 am to Roaad
fail
Posted on 6/27/12 at 10:52 am to hawgndodge
Posted on 6/27/12 at 10:54 am to Roaad
At least the chips are actually falling where they may.
Posted on 6/27/12 at 10:58 am to Roaad
quote:
OU gets the nod for beating them and winning conference.
Agreed. The #5 conference winner would jump a #4 loser in all likelihood under the criteria. The committee looks at win loss record, strength of schedule, conference championships as well as head to head results. Oregon would easily get the nod.
Posted on 6/27/12 at 10:59 am to Roaad
quote:
#1 LSU vs #4 Oregon
#2 Bama vs #3 Okie Lite
I thought OSU was the second best team in the country though? Wouldn't that mean they would beat Bama in the semi's?
Posted on 6/27/12 at 11:02 am to Monticello
quote:I don't know.
I thought OSU was the second best team in the country though?
I think Bama could have beaten them.
Not certain, obviously.
quote:Maybe.
Wouldn't that mean they would beat Bama in the semi's?
Posted on 6/27/12 at 11:03 am to Monticello
quote:yup
Agreed. The #5 conference winner would jump a #4 loser in all likelihood under the criteria. The committee looks at win loss record, strength of schedule, conference championships as well as head to head results. Oregon would easily get the nod.
Posted on 6/27/12 at 11:06 am to Roaad
I don't think LSU would've beat Oregon that late in the year. Oregon was clicking, LSU couldn't move the ball.
Posted on 6/27/12 at 11:08 am to AUCE05
quote:
I don't think LSU would've beat Oregon that late in the year. Oregon was clicking, LSU couldn't move the ball.
nah, Oregon still wouldn't have moved the ball well against LSU. I see a pretty similar result to the first game played between the two.
Posted on 6/27/12 at 11:13 am to Roaad
The sky is not falling. With a selection committee, I imagine that rematches will be avoided if possible. They said that tghe best 4 get in, not that is an absolute 1-4 2-3 setup. 
Posted on 6/27/12 at 11:14 am to AUCE05
quote:LSU's defense got better as the year went on. . .
I don't think LSU would've beat Oregon that late in the year. Oregon was clicking, LSU couldn't move the ball.
I don't think they could have played with LSU late in the season.
LSU struggled to move the ball, sure. . .
. . .against UGA and Bama.
That's like saying. . ."your defense sucks because Peyton Manning threw for 200 yards on you!!!!"
Posted on 6/27/12 at 11:15 am to beachreb61
quote:If it isn't, they would be intentionally aiding the #2 team, in order to frick the #1
not that is an absolute 1-4 2-3 setup.
Posted on 6/27/12 at 11:18 am to Roaad
frick a playoff
Posted on 6/27/12 at 11:19 am to AUCE05
quote:
I don't think LSU would've beat Oregon that late in the year. Oregon was clicking LSU couldn't move the ball.
We moved the ball just fine against anyone that didn't have an elite defense. Oregon finished 67th in total defense
We would have destroyed them...again
Posted on 6/27/12 at 11:21 am to Roaad
quote:
quote:
not that is an absolute 1-4 2-3 setup.
If it isn't, they would be intentionally aiding the #2 team, in order to frick the #1
The do it in baseball all the time. The reason a selection committee is better is that you are not bound by computers, some common sense can prevail. (hopefully...)
Posted on 6/27/12 at 11:25 am to beachreb61
quote:what common sense pits #1 against a better team than the #2 team has to play?
some common sense can prevail. (hopefully...)
Posted on 6/27/12 at 11:29 am to Roaad
quote:
Had we a 4-team playoff last season, LSU would have had 2 rematches
not true.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News