Started By
Message
re: Was the '96 FSU/Florida national title rematch as controversial as '11 Bama/LSU?
Posted on 6/26/12 at 1:47 am to Monticello
Posted on 6/26/12 at 1:47 am to Monticello
the circumstances were pretty different.
Florida lost on the road at FSU, not at home.
Florida won its conference as well.
Alabama should have been there because everyone else lost, but UF had a much better claim to a tittle game IMO
Florida lost on the road at FSU, not at home.
Florida won its conference as well.
Alabama should have been there because everyone else lost, but UF had a much better claim to a tittle game IMO
1
Posted on 6/26/12 at 1:59 am to TigerBait1127
quote:
Florida lost on the road at FSU, not at home.
Florida won its conference as well.
Alabama should have been there because everyone else lost, but UF had a much better claim to a tittle game IMO
All of this. How Oklahoma State losing translates to Alabama being the 2nd best team in the nation is beyond me. If they were truly top 2 all season, they should of been ranked in the top 2 all season.
But they were always #1/#2 all year obviously. But it shouldn't of taken an OSU lost to prove that. That's why the whole eyeball test is dumb as shite.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News