Started By
Message
re: Petrino prediction thread
Posted on 4/6/12 at 1:18 pm to BamaGradinTn
Posted on 4/6/12 at 1:18 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
You wouldn't refer to someone you were riding a bike with a week ago as a "previous" relationship. This is a yet-unnamed additional woman, IMO.
Wait what? You would if it were a relationship that had been going on for a while before the bike thing. She is the "Inapropriate realtionship"
You just added A and B and went straight to X. Makes no sense unless im misunderstanding your post
1
Posted on 4/6/12 at 1:21 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
Petrino prediction thread
quote:
You wouldn't refer to someone you were riding a bike with a week ago as a "previous" relationship. This is a yet-unnamed additional woman, IMO.
Wait what? You would if it were a relationship that had been going on for a while before the bike thing. She is the "Inapropriate realtionship"
You just added A and B and went straight to X. Makes no sense unless im misunderstanding your post
He didn't say "inappropriate relationship". He said "previous inappropriate relationship, i.e., previous to this incident. This implies a relationship that existed previous to this one. The relationship with Dorrell is currently in existence...not previous.
Or, to put it another way...
Are you married? If so, would you refer to your current wife as your previous wife...even if you've been married to her for a while?
This post was edited on 4/6/12 at 1:24 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News