Are you his little ankle biting brother or do you just have a knack for injecting yourself into discussions you aren't a part of?

What part of revisionist history do you fail to comprehend? The vote occurred weeks ago, the vote should be based on the best available knowledge at that time. To look to this game to try to justify a vote weeks ago is nothing short of retarded. And to vote OSU behind Stanford, at the time, was tenuous at best.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by AllBamaDoesIsWin

Member since Dec 2011

26725 posts

Posted on 1/2/12 at 10:34 pm to Tiger Authority

quote:
What part of revisionist history do you fail to comprehend? The vote occurred weeks ago, the vote should be based on the best available knowledge at that time. To look to this game to try to justify a vote weeks ago is nothing short of retarded. And to vote OSU behind Stanford, at the time, was tenuous at best.

LMFAO. Trying to pick at straws are we? He thought they were better then, and this game is proving it. He wasn't looking ahead, he knew Stanford could beat OSU (though neither of them are Top 5 material)

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by FleshEatingSalsa

Floating down the Anduin

Member since Dec 2009

12293 posts

Posted on 1/2/12 at 10:39 pm to Tiger Authority

quote:
What part of revisionist history do you fail to comprehend? The vote occurred weeks ago, the vote should be based on the best available knowledge at that time. To look to this game to try to justify a vote weeks ago is nothing short of retarded. And to vote OSU behind Stanford, at the time, was tenuous at best.

Maybe Saban, or whoever filled out the ballot, knows more about football than you do.