Started By
Message
Would Bama have beaten LSU's non-Bama opponents?
Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:01 pm
Would Bama be favored against these opponenets?
Oregon - yes
Northwestern - yes
MSU - beat 'em worse than Lester did
WV Mountaineers - yes
Kentucky - LOL
UF - softened 'em up for Lester
UT - pounded 'em
AU - pounded 'em
WKU Hilltoppers -
Ole Miss - heppin' Nutt pack
Arky - beatdown
UGA - yes
The only team on that schedule which Bama may not have been a double digit favorite over is Oregon...and we all know Bama would have whipped them too.
All you folks who want to act like LSU is some conquering army which headed into the Hinterlands to pillage all challengers, while Bama just barely squeeked by an easy schedule can suck it.
LSU didn't play one team this season which Bama wouldn't have also beaten...not 1.
Oregon - yes
Northwestern - yes
MSU - beat 'em worse than Lester did
WV Mountaineers - yes
Kentucky - LOL
UF - softened 'em up for Lester
UT - pounded 'em
AU - pounded 'em
WKU Hilltoppers -
Ole Miss - heppin' Nutt pack
Arky - beatdown
UGA - yes
The only team on that schedule which Bama may not have been a double digit favorite over is Oregon...and we all know Bama would have whipped them too.
All you folks who want to act like LSU is some conquering army which headed into the Hinterlands to pillage all challengers, while Bama just barely squeeked by an easy schedule can suck it.
LSU didn't play one team this season which Bama wouldn't have also beaten...not 1.
63
Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:02 pm to FTBLFN
The difference is LSU scheduled them, Bama didn't.
Go play Clemson in Atlanta or something. ha
Go play Clemson in Atlanta or something. ha
Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:03 pm to FTBLFN
This is the most homer and unnecessary OP I've seen in a while, scratch that I see shite like this every day
Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:03 pm to ECOTIGER
Yes. No question.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:04 pm to FTBLFN
quote:
All you folks who want to act like LSU is some conquering army which headed into the Hinterlands to pillage all challengers, while Bama just barely squeeked by an easy schedule can suck it.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:05 pm to FTBLFN
The Oregon speed and tempo might have given bama more trouble than it did LSU because LSU is faster at LB and rotates more depth in the defense. I don't think it is a given that bama wins this game. It's not a good matchup for bama.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:05 pm to JBREAUX4LSU
quote:
This is the most homer and unnecessary OP I've seen in a while
It is pretty bad.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:05 pm to JBREAUX4LSU
quote:
This is the most homer and unnecessary OP I've seen in a while, scratch that I see shite like this every day
You mean like this one?
LINK
Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:06 pm to I Love Bama
Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:07 pm to FTBLFN
quote:
LSU didn't play one team this season which Bama wouldn't have also beaten...not 1.
I don't think bama could have beat bama on the road.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:07 pm to FTBLFN
Actually...comparing that schedule & SECCG to Bama's 2009 campaign is laughable.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:07 pm to JBREAUX4LSU
Having said that, do I believe they would've beaten Oregon, WV, and UGA?...Yeah most likely. But there's really no way to tell. WV game was in front of a ruckus crowd, UGA's defense prob couldve dealt with TRICH, and Oregons speed is a lot to handle. And although I believe BAMA has a lot of speed they prob don't have anywhere near the speed up front on the DLINE that LSU has, and I believe that was a huge difference having Mingo, Montgomery and Brockers running down James from behind
Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:07 pm to FTBLFN
quote:
All you folks who want to act like LSU is some conquering army which headed into the Hinterlands to pillage all challengers, while Bama just barely squeeked by an easy schedule can suck it
Bookmarked for 1/10/12....I'll be back to laugh at you when Bama village idiots get raped and pillaged......
Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:08 pm to mckibaj
quote:
non-Bama opponents
Don't read good?
Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:08 pm to FTBLFN
I would seriously question whether Bama could have beaten Oregon. Their style of play gives Bama a hard time. And for the first game of the year I believe Oregon would have had a chance. Also WVA would have given bama a hard time too. And as someone else stated bama would never schedule this tough of an out of conference schedule.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:08 pm to FTBLFN
quote:
The only team on that schedule which Bama may not have been a double digit favorite over is Oregon...and we all know Bama would have whipped them too.
If Bama struggled with LSU's option to the outside, they could also have struggled with Oregon's speed.
And if a small no name college put up 200+ rushing yards on Bama...
Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:08 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
TreyAnastasio
Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:09 pm to TreyAnastasio
You are right, it goes both ways Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:09 pm to StPeteLSU
quote:
I would seriously question whether Bama could have beaten Oregon.
quote:
lso WVA would have given bama a hard time too
Posted on 12/21/11 at 1:09 pm to FTBLFN
quote:
Would Bama have beaten LSU's non-Bama opponents?
quote:
non-Bama opponents
Don't read good?
Don't write well?
Page 1 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News