Started By
Message

re: Should there be an actual BCS rule against a rematch?

Posted on 12/4/11 at 9:55 am to
Posted by tidefan6296
Member since Oct 2011
19 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 9:55 am to
So, LSU wants to play the number 2 team in the championship game as long as it's NOT Bama.
Posted by jlc05
Member since Nov 2005
32909 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Message Posted by tidefan6296 So, LSU wants to play the number 2 team in the championship game as long as it's NOT Bama.


Keep telling yourself that. Good luck on your quest to pay off the voters today.
Posted by DCtide
Member since Oct 2010
57 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 10:00 am to
LSU has NO fear of anyone ...meaning coach miles and the players they are willing and able to take on all comers and have proven it all year .. its lsu fans who are a mix of annoyed (having to beat a team twice when they already did on road) and worried (won't use scared) because like most they know bama is only team who MIGHT beat them.. does that sound like a fair analysis? If tide had won 11/5 I would be pissed to have to beat lsu again in Nawlins so I understand what they are saying.

as for rematch clause won't happen and this will all be moot soon because if the sec keeps up this dominance we will likely see rematches more often in a plus one or 4 team or 8 team playoff in 2 years when new contract in place.
This post was edited on 12/4/11 at 10:03 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter