re: NCAA Proposes Cecil Newton Law to Close Loophole That AU Slipped Through

I can not understand how in the world that was the verbiage if it ever was - because typically the schools providing illicit benefits are the only ones who could prove the benefits were provided (and they are not likely to turn themselves in)

That makes for a near impossible enforcement situation - it is hard enough to find enough evidence to be convinced a kid sought illicit benefits

And what if the kid didn't seek them but they start showing up (envelopes of cash) in his locker? Isn't he still eligible if that verbiage is the key? After all - he never sought them out... he just received them

whole thing strikes me as crazy