The distinction is simple. Reggie bush was found to have received money. To compare the penalties auburn woudl face before you can prove cam took money is irresponsible and foolhardy.

I see your point about ineligibility. However, that was ruled on and at some point with the facts you have, that the NCAA deemed his father soliciting money from MSU and then being eligible at auburn, you've just got to accept it and move on. If the NCAA found/finds he recieved money (like bush) prayers will be answered and auburn will burn.

Also the reason im making that comparison/distinction is because it was eloquently asked why USC got fricked. USC got fricked because reggie bush was proven to have received improper benefits. Something that has yet to be show with auburn.

This post was edited on 7/27/11 at 2:26 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by NOLA Aub

New Orleans, LA

Member since Apr 2011

206 posts

Posted on 7/27/11 at 2:32 pm to piggidyphish

quote:
I see your point about ineligibility. However, that was ruled on and at some point with the facts you have, that the NCAA deemed his father soliciting money from MSU and then being eligible at auburn, you've just got to accept it and move on. If the NCAA found/finds he recieved money from the school in which he played(like bush) prayers will be answered and auburn will burn.

Fixed. Even if they find that MSU paid him, which they haven't as of now, Auburn is still in the clear.

See the Albert Means case, and how he was allowed to play at Memphis.

3 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board