Started By
Message
re: Jake Locker or Cam Newton?
Posted on 12/25/10 at 5:12 pm to adammwilson
Posted on 12/25/10 at 5:12 pm to adammwilson
quote:
in a pro style offense which do you think would be better?
Newton by a mile. He is a much better passer. Locker is nothing without his running ability.
quote:
agreed he did in every game but Clemson. However, Auburn is a better team and if Darvin wasn't playing well Cam could win the game by himself or use his TE, or #2 WR or even his #3 WR.
Overall Auburn has some more offensive talent than Washington but a good reason why it looked that way was because Cam Newton is THAT much better than Locker. There is no questioning Newton blew away Locker this year. Do you really think Locker would of had any close to a similar year playing with Auburn as Newton did? Not a chance.
quote:
Auburn plays better competition. No telling what those players would do vs. weaker competition.
So wait a second, wouldnt this also work against you in the Cam vs. Jake debate? Cam not only played leaps and bounds better this year but played MUCH tougher competition overall.
quote:
whose?
Which recently updated list is he still Top 10/15 in (that's reputable)? He's #23 now on ESPN Scout INC after starting the year #1.
quote:
every draft website.
I frequent a few and havent really heard a thing about him since beginning of year. He's fallen way off.
Posted on 12/25/10 at 5:18 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
Cam not only played leaps and bounds better this year but played MUCH tougher competition overall.
it would except look at the O he plays in.
quote:
Which recently updated list is he still Top 10/15 in (that's reputable)?
LINK
LINK
quote:
He's #23 now on ESPN Scout INC after starting the year #1.
doesn't mean he will get taken that late just means OVERALL he is the #23 player.
quote:
He's fallen way off.
still BY FAR the #1 SR. QB.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News