Started By
Message

re: NCAA had no choice

Posted on 12/2/10 at 2:30 pm to
Posted by BamaChick
Terminus
Member since Dec 2008
21393 posts
Posted on 12/2/10 at 2:30 pm to
Okay, now is when you fall into the delusional aubbie category.

Just to remind you - from Cecil and Cam's own mouths, before this whole thing broke-

quote:

Newton let his father make the final decision, and a few days before Christmas, while sitting at the dinner table in his brother's house in Jacksonville, Cecil Sr. uttered two words that would radically alter the college football landscape: "It's Auburn."


Don't piss on my leg and tell me it's raining.
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
86121 posts
Posted on 12/2/10 at 2:30 pm to
Wow he is yelling at you now....I think you touched a nerve
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
35533 posts
Posted on 12/2/10 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

Just to remind you - from Cecil and Cam's own mouths, before this whole thing broke-



But this mentions nothing of Cam knowing about the money stuff. Just that Cecil told his son to go to AU. How does that directly mean "Cam knew about everything?".

Also, I had this pointed out too me and it has a lot of correlation to what is going on.


Here is the full text of the NCAA's statement ...

The NCAA student-athlete reinstatement staff has reinstated the eligibility of University of Alabama football student-athletes Julio Jones and Mark Ingram based on a condition of repayment.

According to the facts of the case submitted by Alabama, the student-athletes received impermissible food, lodging, transportation and entertainment from an individual with whom one of the student-athletes had become acquainted prior to enrolling in college.

Consistent with NCAA membership requirements, the institution reported the violation and declared the student-athletes ineligible. As part of the reinstatement request, the institution required the student-athletes to make repayment of the value of the impermissible benefits to charity.

During the reinstatement process, the NCAA staff considers a number of factors including guidelines established by the NCAA Division I Committee on Student-Athlete Reinstatement, relevant case precedent, the student-athlete's responsibility for the violation, as well as any mitigating factors presented by the institution.


The fishing case had a very similar ruling as this one, but Juio and ingram had to repay the benefits they received. In Cam's case, no benefits were received, so he didn't have to repay anything before being reinstated. Just found it interesting.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter