Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/2/10 at 2:15 pm to Music City Hog
You do realize that IF they would have ruled that:
1. Parent and player are the same as far as violations are concerned.
2. Soliciting benefits is the same as receiving them.
They would have merely been firmly establishing what just about EVERY SCHOOL THOUGHT WAS THE RULES ANYWAY.
Would have been an actual common sense ruling that cut off any thought of this from most anyone else that would attempt it.
1. Parent and player are the same as far as violations are concerned.
2. Soliciting benefits is the same as receiving them.
They would have merely been firmly establishing what just about EVERY SCHOOL THOUGHT WAS THE RULES ANYWAY.
Would have been an actual common sense ruling that cut off any thought of this from most anyone else that would attempt it.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News