Started By
Message
re: Evidently...Gus and Chiz were at Shiloh last night
Posted on 11/20/10 at 12:36 pm to jcole4lsu
Posted on 11/20/10 at 12:36 pm to jcole4lsu
quote:
lol if that was seriously your comeback.
It wasn't about "comeback". It was a serious inquiry. If the NCAA always makes teams forfeit games when a player is retroactively ruled ineligible, why no forfeiture of these two games for UNC? I was just remarking that your response to my question appeared to be an, I don't know.
Sometimes I get the feeling a few of you take these message boards way to seriously.
quote:
RMFTBama
This post was edited on 11/20/10 at 12:40 pm
2
Posted on 11/20/10 at 12:43 pm to michaeldwde
i gave you a valid reason, you chose to be a smartass. probably because thats easier than accepting the trainwreck thats coming.
unc was proactive, ncaa was lienient.
usc buried their head in the sand, ncaa threw the book at them.
which do you think au falls under at this point?
unc was proactive, ncaa was lienient.
usc buried their head in the sand, ncaa threw the book at them.
which do you think au falls under at this point?
Posted on 11/20/10 at 2:29 pm to michaeldwde
quote:
michaeldwde
You are really dumb and really bad at this.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News