quote:
Right, but in the stories which are pro-Auburn, the unnamed sources are legit, but when the stories implicate Auburn, the sources are invalid because they are unnamed.

Deny, delfect.

Not too bad being on the other side of this. I see why we were accused of denying and deflecting.

But yea, it'd be a pretty bold move by any of us aubs to take this unnamed source as the gospel and deny the others...but for those who took the unnamed sources in other articles as fact, well can't have your cake and eat it too.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by bigkolb

BAMA

Member since Nov 2010

22 posts

Posted on 11/18/10 at 3:41 pm to piggidyphish

If I remember reading somewhere that the tapes were to be sealed.
Just because the reporter says that Mcgregor was not recorded on wiretaps about cam newton does not mean that he is not connected still.

LINK

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by cyde

He gone

Member since Nov 2005

31793 posts

Posted on 11/18/10 at 3:44 pm to piggidyphish

quote:
Deny, delfect.

That would be a fair response, save for the fact that it is inapplicable.

I'm not denying the story, attempting to devalue the sources, or deflecting attention away from the story.

I'm attacking you, the fans.

Save the "deny, deflect" tack for if, for instance, I change the subject to talk about a different recruiting scandal or flat-out call this story a "fricking lie".