Started By
Message

re: **Cam Newton investigation UPDATED Page 1 - 11/5, 1:30am**

Posted on 11/6/10 at 9:22 am to
Posted by cameronml
Member since Oct 2007
1909 posts
Posted on 11/6/10 at 9:22 am to
I'm no financial expert, but couldn't Cecil Newton have just taken out a loan to do the $50,000 in necessary repairs? Why does everyone assume the money is dirty? People/businesses need large sums of money all the time, and last time I checked a loan was a pretty common and legal way to get sudden influx of funds.
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
28041 posts
Posted on 11/6/10 at 9:31 am to
quote:

I'm no financial expert, but couldn't Cecil Newton have just taken out a loan to do the $50,000 in necessary repairs?

Tight economy. Cecil would have to show several months of bank account statements to secure a loan, which with no congregation, no income would be shown.

No income, no loan.

Also, with a loan, all the repairs would have had to be done once. Not over three separate months.

Appears that the deal for Cam was performance based.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter