Started By
Message
re: Mythical Championship for Bama
Posted on 10/1/10 at 4:10 pm to Monticello
Posted on 10/1/10 at 4:10 pm to Monticello
quote:
So, I guess all the Heisman voters who voted for him were all Bama fans. WOW I did not realize our fan base was so large. A truly stupid post.
So I guess you stopped reading my post there and failed to go on and read where I specifically said Ingram won the heisman because he played for Bama and not Stanford. Once again, switch Ingram and Gerhart and Gerhart wins the heisman if playing for Bama.
1
Posted on 10/1/10 at 4:19 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
Once again, switch Ingram and Gerhart and Gerhart wins the heisman if playing for Bama.
Gerhardt would not have started for Alabama. If Ingram never came to Alabama, Richardson would have started over him.
When everything was equalized in the combine and NFL draft, we saw that Gerhardt was not thought of to be an elite talent by the experts.
Stanford has an excellent OL. This years team shows that.
Ingram averaged a yard more per touch than Gerhardt. He went for over 100 against the Florida and Texas D's which were excellent and with an SEC and national title on the line.
And since when was it not a legitimate argument to factor in the impact a player has on his overall team? Gerhardt led his team to 9 wins and irrelevancy. They also had the future #1 draft pick at QB. Ingram led his team to an SEC and national title.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News