Started By
Message

re: Serious question/poll re: Bama's claimed NC

Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:51 pm to
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90739 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:51 pm to
The AP was part of the accepted formula in 2003, thus, using that argument, there was a split then and not a "true" winner.
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47824 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:54 pm to
If the AP was relegated to being only a mere part of a formula, they wouldn't have the grounds to crown their own independent champion.

They took on an independent role in the creation of their rankings and independently crowned USC the champion.
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 10:55 pm to
quote:

there was a split then and not a "true" winner.


I'm not arguing that more than two teams could win the title. I'm arguing that one guy holed up in his office in 1945 awarding a #1 ranking to a team in 1934 is not legitimate.

The AP is comprised of numerous voters that are currently recognized as legitimate based on their experience as a sports journalist. The timing of the final ranking is immediately following the final football game of the year and is accepted by all FBS conferences and teams.

Bottom line: retroactively awarded championships should not count
This post was edited on 12/4/09 at 10:58 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter