Started By
Message
locked post

This Ole Miss season looks a lot like the 4 - 4 SEC record

Posted on 11/28/09 at 2:38 pm
Posted by Choctaw Hog
Member since Nov 2006
7586 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 2:38 pm
Nutt had when he had 3 NFL RB in the same backfield. This Ole Miss team has a lot of talent, the overwhelming majority that was recruited by Orgeron, but Nutt has once again shown his incompetence as a coach.

He relies on rah, rah bull shite to get his teams "ready" to play instead of relying good game plans with great and productive practices. The results? Teams with a lot of ups and downs and very inconsistent.
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
51388 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 2:42 pm to
2-0 against Arkansas.
Posted by Rome26
Dallas, Tx
Member since May 2009
502 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

Nutt had when he had 3 NFL RB in the same backfield. This Ole Miss team has a lot of talent, the overwhelming majority that was recruited by Orgeron, but Nutt has once again shown his incompetence as a coach.


Nutt didn't win with DMAC, Hillis, and Felix because he failed to put a decent D on the field.

A great run game doesn't make a great team.
Posted by UM Rebel
Member since Jan 2009
1531 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 2:50 pm to
How can you say there was a bad gameplan? Did you even watch the game? They just manhandled our D-line. Not much coaching could do.
Posted by Cruiserhog
Little Rock
Member since Apr 2008
10460 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

2-0 against Arkansas.


that will be the only two ever again with Petrino and Nutt matched up you can book that.
Posted by LutherBottalico
Member since Nov 2009
61 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 2:52 pm to
man this is your second post where I don't think you understand much about the dynamics of football. Did you see the state where the home team had won the last 9 of 10 of that match up?

Nutt is 10 of 12 now against Msu for his career. Eventually something had to give. You are confusing and seem to know little about the game of football or
Posted by joydivision
Member since Nov 2008
179 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 2:55 pm to
I'll take 1 loss a year because of Nutt on the oposition as opposed to the usual 4-6 as my teams head coach.
This post was edited on 11/28/09 at 2:58 pm
Posted by UM Rebel
Member since Jan 2009
1531 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 2:57 pm to
what usual 4-6?
Posted by joydivision
Member since Nov 2008
179 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 3:02 pm to
the usual 4-6 losses you are guaranteed to get with Nutt at the helm.
Posted by UM Rebel
Member since Jan 2009
1531 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 3:08 pm to
But he has a winning record right?
Posted by NorCalHog
Tulsa, OK
Member since Nov 2006
386 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

How can you say there was a bad gameplan? Did you even watch the game? They just manhandled our D-line. Not much coaching could do.


Yes. Your D line was picked apart.

But I am having a hard time figuring out what that had to do with Snead throwing "how many" int's?

The quarterback killa strikes again.
Posted by UM Rebel
Member since Jan 2009
1531 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 3:28 pm to
The first was a bad throw, though McCluster got bumped a little. It still shouldn't have been thrown. The second was off the receivers hands, and still a bad throw. WR shouldn't allow for it to be a pick though. The third looked like Snead thought Hodge was going to run a different route or something. But you gotta get the run going. The main reason we lost is they could run and we couldn't for the most part.
Posted by NorCalHog
Tulsa, OK
Member since Nov 2006
386 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

The first was a bad throw, though McCluster got bumped a little. It still shouldn't have been thrown. The second was off the receivers hands, and still a bad throw. WR shouldn't allow for it to be a pick though. The third looked like Snead thought Hodge was going to run a different route or something. But you gotta get the run going. The main reason we lost is they could run and we couldn't for the most part.


Believe what you want. But before the season began, you had a realistic Heisman candidate at quarterback, one of the best runningbacks in the SEC, a hugely stout defense, and the number 4 ranked team in the country, all coupled with a pitifully weak schedule. This should have been a championship season for Ole Miss.

If you want to give Houston Nutt a bye on taking all that talent and turning it into an average football team, that's up to you.

Sooner or later, you'll run out of excuses. But remember this statement. Right now, Ole Miss will never have a better team than you do right now. You'll realize that when Nutt's recruited players begin to cycle into the starting line up.

As a fan, you're in big trouble. I think it's sad that you don't even realize it yet.
This post was edited on 11/28/09 at 3:59 pm
Posted by joydivision
Member since Nov 2008
179 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 4:05 pm to
Yes, a winning record and perpetual mediocrity.
Posted by LutherBottalico
Member since Nov 2009
61 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 4:11 pm to
I completely disagree about championship.

Where in their recent recruiting or history do they have championship potential? They have had one good recruit class recently which if you check was about middle of the pack in the SEC considering who enrolled and is still there. The 05 and 07 classes were below SEC average.

Ole Miss problem this year was offensive line, and not alot of depth at LB or DB. People think Oregeron was a great recruiter but he basically recruited defensive line. Every other posistion was below average. Nutt is a very good coach, bordering on hall of fame in my opinion, but the expectations Arkansas fans and now Ole Miss fans put on him b/c he couldn't bring their perenial bottom feeder a national championship is ridiculous.
Posted by blackrose890
Fayetteville, AR
Member since Apr 2009
6336 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 4:13 pm to
Wildrebeltime nice to see your new alter, how does it feel to be wrong again?
Posted by joydivision
Member since Nov 2008
179 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 4:15 pm to
Arkansas is certainly a bottom feeder as far as in state talent, but as a program that is pish posh. Arkansas as a program from was a bottom feeder in the early 90's and a couple years within the last decade, but otherwise not so much.
Posted by digitalis
Member since Oct 2009
411 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 4:20 pm to
lol good call blackrose, thats definitely wildrebeltime!

Despite Hootie's win against Arkansas everything we have said about him has come true.

wildrebeltime: This is what your season is going to look like next year! You won't be able to run the ball. You are NOT a power running team and you rely on scatbacks to make plays, not the offensive line.
Posted by LutherBottalico
Member since Nov 2009
61 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 4:21 pm to
Most of Arkansas SEC years was with a coach they ran off. If you look at how Msu played today against a very good Ole Miss team and evaluate how recruiting is going for everyone in the west it's hard to see Arkansas getting out of the basement of the SEC west any time soon. They'll win a few good games at home but I don't see them getting over 2-6 to 3-5. They can't build defense up there.
Posted by blackrose890
Fayetteville, AR
Member since Apr 2009
6336 posts
Posted on 11/28/09 at 4:24 pm to
Why must you make the assertion that it can't be done. It has been done, but lulled due to poor coaching in our recent history starting with Crowe. Please don't pull this historical bullshite it makes you look like the world never needed to move beyond steam engines.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter