Started By
Message

re: POLL>>>>

Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:20 pm to
Posted by magiLSU
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2004
2356 posts
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:20 pm to

As stated earlier, you have no conclusive evidence that Julio touched the ball or was not in the air if the touch occurred, so drop your argument.
This post was edited on 11/8/09 at 11:22 pm
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
26444 posts
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:39 pm to
The "Julio touched the ball" argument is a stupid one, but FWIW it's a 5-yard penalty if a player goes out of bounds and is the first to touch the ball without re-establishing himself back in bounds. It's called illegal touching.
This post was edited on 11/8/09 at 11:40 pm
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36169 posts
Posted on 11/9/09 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

As stated earlier, you have no conclusive evidence that Julio touched the ball or was not in the air if the touch occurred, so drop your argument.


And you don't have any that he didn't. There were calls blown on both sides. I think if there's no doubt Julio doesn't touch the ball out of bounds, it's easily an INT. If it's called an INT on the field, it should stay an INT. But there's not conclusive evidence that it wasn't incomplete.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter