Started By
Message
2
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:20 pm to Teague
As stated earlier, you have no conclusive evidence that Julio touched the ball or was not in the air if the touch occurred, so drop your argument.
This post was edited on 11/8/09 at 11:22 pm
Posted on 11/9/09 at 5:29 pm to Teague
Now, wait a minute. What about the endzone dive I mentioned before? The play is live if a player that's out of bounds and in the air touches the ball, provided he does not land out of bounds and then touch the ball before the play is blown dead.
So either:
1. Jones does not touch the ground and touches the ball; result: interception, because the play is live and Peterson clearly intercepted it.
2. Jones does touch the ground and the ball; result: interception, with 5-yard illegal touching penalty declined.
3. Jones does not touch the ground and does not touch the ball; result: interception, because the play is live and Peterson clearly intercepted it.
4. Jones does touch the ground and does not touch the ball; result: interception, because the play is live and Peterson clearly intercepted it.
So which is it? 1, 2, 3, 4, or "Bama gets one pick back for free?"
So either:
1. Jones does not touch the ground and touches the ball; result: interception, because the play is live and Peterson clearly intercepted it.
2. Jones does touch the ground and the ball; result: interception, with 5-yard illegal touching penalty declined.
3. Jones does not touch the ground and does not touch the ball; result: interception, because the play is live and Peterson clearly intercepted it.
4. Jones does touch the ground and does not touch the ball; result: interception, because the play is live and Peterson clearly intercepted it.
So which is it? 1, 2, 3, 4, or "Bama gets one pick back for free?"
This post was edited on 11/9/09 at 5:31 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News