Started By
Message

re: POLL>>>>

Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:19 pm to
Posted by Teague
The Shoals, AL
Member since Aug 2007
21706 posts
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

FWIW, it's stupid to make that claim and you make yourself look a little silly. You know it was the wrong call just like everything else ... there's no defending it.


After watching and rewatching the video, I think it would have probably been the wrong call IF Julio did not touch the ball while out of bounds. But he does. Now, does Peterson have control of it before Julio's foot comes down out of bounds? I don't know. But it's a very very close call, despite all the whining to the contrary on this board.
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
26443 posts
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:21 pm to
Spin it any way you want, but it was an interception and there was clear video evidence showing that it was an interception.

Posted by TigersRuleTheEarth
Laffy
Member since Jan 2007
28643 posts
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

Teague


I never thought there would be a Gump dumb enough to try and dispute that the call was wrong, but I sold the Gumps short. There's always one dumb enough no matter what.
Posted by magiLSU
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2004
2356 posts
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:27 pm to
quote:


After watching and rewatching the video, I think it would have probably been the wrong call IF Julio did not touch the ball while out of bounds. But he does.

So where's your proof that Julio touched the ball? Cuz I sure as hell don't see anything..
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter