Started By
Message

Auburn 2004 SEC team of the decade?
Posted on 10/31/09 at 10:11 am
Posted on 10/31/09 at 10:11 am
They get my vote.
Posted on 10/31/09 at 10:12 am to CrimsonTusk
lol. not a damn chance.
Posted on 10/31/09 at 10:15 am to m2pro
M2pro. Who else? They went undefeated and every other team lose a game and has an excuse. That team won every game no excuses. That is what I like. I think if Alabama or Florida goes undefeated this year it will have a strong case. And while in my opinion the SEC was down that year that was simply a dominate team.
Posted on 10/31/09 at 10:36 am to CrimsonTusk
lsu 03, they won the nc 

Posted on 10/31/09 at 10:37 am to CrimsonTusk
quote:
CrimsonTusk
i get it. you're building your credibility that you can be objective. that's cool... the SEC team of the DECADE??? are you out of your damn mind? that auburn team would get their asses BEAT by Saban's NC team, and several florida squads...
Posted on 10/31/09 at 10:38 am to CrimsonTusk
Yep. Only undefeated team this decade.
Posted on 10/31/09 at 11:07 am to FootballHog
quote:
Only undefeated team this decade.
Thus far.
Posted on 10/31/09 at 11:15 am to m2pro
m2? Cred with who I call him as I see them.
LSU 03 possibly
LSU 07 obviously not
They(Auburn) beat Florida in 2006 without all the studs on the 04 teams
Florida 08- If Ole Miss beat them Auburn 2004 would have destroyed them.
As I said if Alabama or Florida go undefeated this year they would have a strong case.
LSU 03 possibly
LSU 07 obviously not
They(Auburn) beat Florida in 2006 without all the studs on the 04 teams
Florida 08- If Ole Miss beat them Auburn 2004 would have destroyed them.
As I said if Alabama or Florida go undefeated this year they would have a strong case.
Posted on 10/31/09 at 11:19 am to CrimsonTusk
quote:
CrimsonTusk
if you really think that Auburn team is the best team of the decade, that's cool. i just think that borders insanity.
there are a lot of factors in every game of football. florida losing to Ole Miss last year was indeed a fluke.
Posted on 10/31/09 at 11:20 am to CrimsonTusk
quote:
They(Auburn) beat Florida in 2006 without all the studs on the 04 teams
Florida 08- If Ole Miss beat them Auburn 2004 would have destroyed them.
Florida in 08 lost to Ole Miss so that means Auburn 2004 would have destroyed them? Nice argument.
Florida drilled everybody after that Ole Miss loss, Auburn of 2004 would have had the same thing happen to them IMO.
This post was edited on 10/31/09 at 11:22 am
Posted on 10/31/09 at 11:21 am to Tom288
quote:
Ugh, Auburn and the refs beat the 06 UF team.
yep. refs blocked that punt

Posted on 10/31/09 at 11:21 am to Tom288
Nope... your shitty punt team lost the 2006 game.
that, and Leak decided to throw picks and fumble.
that, and Leak decided to throw picks and fumble.
Posted on 10/31/09 at 11:22 am to auzach91
quote:
yep. refs blocked that punt
No they just happen to not call a fumble a forward-pass.
Posted on 10/31/09 at 11:22 am to lowspark12
quote:
that, and Leak decided to throw picks and fumble.
bullshite, that wasn't a fumble.
Posted on 10/31/09 at 11:23 am to CrimsonTusk
a team that didn't win the title isn't team of the decade.
Posted on 10/31/09 at 11:29 am to Louie T
I've gotta go with yes.
That was a very strong team. I think I'd take 2006 LSU against just about any of the NC teams this decade though..

That was a very strong team. I think I'd take 2006 LSU against just about any of the NC teams this decade though..

Posted on 10/31/09 at 11:35 am to bmy
quote:
That was a very strong team. I think I'd take 2006 LSU against just about any of the NC teams this decade though..
Oddly enough, the LSU 2007 team looked better than any team in country has looked this year.
But I would go with the 2003 LSU team as the team of the decade.
Posted on 10/31/09 at 11:38 am to CrimsonTusk
That team should have played for the championship, but I don't think it would have won. That being said, it wasn't the best SEC team in the decade.
Back to top
