Started By
Message
re: who would you rather have in the SEC....
Posted on 6/20/09 at 4:32 pm to los angeles tiger
Posted on 6/20/09 at 4:32 pm to los angeles tiger
meh again. if tulane was in the SEC there would probably be a stadium on or very near campus, which in turn would lead to higher attendance. and if the sec had a few better schools, like GT and TU, maybe the big 10's commissioner wouldn't be so quick to basically call the conference stupid
This post was edited on 6/20/09 at 4:36 pm
2
Posted on 6/20/09 at 4:37 pm to TulaneTigerFan
You had a stadium on campus. What happened to it? You tore it down.
There is no benefit for the SEC to add Tulane. Hell, it would be better to have Memphis in the SEC over Tulane.
The SEC is not in the business of providing welfare for you weenies. It's bad enough that LSU is playing y'all again in football. You don't even sell out your allotment of tickets to Tiger Stadium for that game.
There is no benefit for the SEC to add Tulane. Hell, it would be better to have Memphis in the SEC over Tulane.
The SEC is not in the business of providing welfare for you weenies. It's bad enough that LSU is playing y'all again in football. You don't even sell out your allotment of tickets to Tiger Stadium for that game.
This post was edited on 6/20/09 at 4:38 pm
Posted on 6/20/09 at 4:48 pm to TulaneTigerFan
quote:
and if the sec had a few better schools, like GT and TU, maybe the big 10's commissioner wouldn't be so quick to basically call the conference stupid
I would take Texas A@M over Tulane because they are a good school, have a good sports program, and would be a way better rival than Tulane or Arkansas for LSU.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News