Started By
Message
So the Georgia loss last night was a complete anomaly; SEC tourney record now sits at 7-1
Posted on 3/20/26 at 4:56 pm
Posted on 3/20/26 at 4:56 pm
SEC continues to impress in the first round. Maybe Auburn and Oklahoma should have been in? Oklahoma, especially.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 4:58 pm to Contra
Mike White is not an anomaly. He has a proven track record.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 4:59 pm to Contra
quote:
Maybe Auburn and Oklahoma should have been in?

Posted on 3/20/26 at 5:03 pm to Contra
Florida isn’t losing..
TN game is over..
That’s 9-1
+ Mizzou / Miami coin flip
Not bad..
TN game is over..
That’s 9-1
+ Mizzou / Miami coin flip
Not bad..
Posted on 3/20/26 at 5:09 pm to Contra
quote:
SEC continues to impress in the first round. Maybe Auburn and Oklahoma should have been in? Oklahoma, especially.
So I was thinking about this today. And I've wondered about this when trying to evaluate football teams ... how to bet ... and such. Warning ... there will be math.
If you put in three teams, and they're all low seeds, do you suck if they all lose ? I'd say no. So for March Madness - something as simple as "results against seed" would make sense to me when judging how well a league does.
Two ways would work. One - my favorite - would be losses are a negative if you lose against a lower seed, and wins against a higher seed are a positive. All calculated by difference of seed.
Option two might also work. Losses are a negative of the seed you lost to. Wins are a positive of (17 - seed you beat).
Posted on 3/20/26 at 7:07 pm to SM1010
quote:
Mike White is not an anomaly. He has a proven track record.
Was coming to post this
Posted on 3/20/26 at 7:09 pm to Contra
Haven't heard any announcers mention it. If we were doing worse they would be crowing about it.
Popular
Back to top
5








