Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

ND

Posted on 12/15/25 at 5:48 am
Posted by bamaoldtimer
Member since Dec 2009
1693 posts
Posted on 12/15/25 at 5:48 am
1. Should we let ND in SEC with similar arrangement as ACC?

2. Should ND be a full member of SEC?

My answer to 1. No
My answer to 2. Hell No.

Will it happen? I’m afraid Sankey and ESPN will push for it. Why else would the AD at ND only call Sankey as he mentioned after being snubbed. From playoff?

Thoughts?
Posted by TDFreak
Coast to Coast - L.A. to Chicago
Member since Dec 2009
8954 posts
Posted on 12/15/25 at 5:50 am to
If it pisses Bama fans off that much, let ‘em in.
Posted by white beans
Member since Sep 2009
6575 posts
Posted on 12/15/25 at 9:37 am to
they are a b10 school just stick them in there and be done with it
Posted by Rodo
Houston
Member since Aug 2011
1697 posts
Posted on 12/15/25 at 9:40 am to
Does the ND media contract reach the SEC payout amount? If not, they would be dilutive and we don't need another dilutive act by Sankey (Horns and Sooners)

Rodo
Posted by twk
Wichita Falls, Texas
Member since Jul 2011
2832 posts
Posted on 12/15/25 at 9:48 am to
I don't want to help them out in the efforts to hurt the ACC. If they leave the ACC in other sports, I have zero interest in them becoming a partial member of the SEC.

If, however, they leave the ACC of their own volition, and park their other sports in the Big East (which doesn't play football), I wouldn't rule out something like a four game scheduling agreement, the main feature of which is we'd line up 2 games in October and 2 in November (one being the week before Thanksgiving). That scheduling flexibility is something they will desperately need if they sever ties with the ACC. The Big Ten historically doesn't permit non-conference games once conference play starts.

I wouldn't pay them a dime for this, realizing that it would benefit them more than the SEC, but it wouldn't be bad for us to have more interesting non-conference games. Might even limit the deal to the 12 SEC members who don't play an ACC team to finish the season, so you'd have these teams play ND once every three years (home and away over a six year span). They already have contracts to play several SEC teams, so it's not like there is some taboo against playing them.
Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
17125 posts
Posted on 12/15/25 at 10:02 am to
quote:

1. Should we let ND in SEC with similar arrangement as ACC?

2. Should ND be a full member of SEC?


Here's an idea. Why don't we all get rid of these absolutely worthless conference championship games and be like Notre Dame? Then ND wouldn't have to fear #24 James Madison and #19 ranked Tulane taking their top 10 spot.

Posted by twk
Wichita Falls, Texas
Member since Jul 2011
2832 posts
Posted on 12/15/25 at 11:28 am to
quote:

Here's an idea. Why don't we all get rid of these absolutely worthless conference championship games and be like Notre Dame? Then ND wouldn't have to fear #24 James Madison and #19 ranked Tulane taking their top 10 spot.
Then you'd have the conference championships decided by silly tiebreakers where you end up with a team that clearly wasn't the best getting the automatic bid. E.g., 2025 Alabama.
Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
17125 posts
Posted on 12/15/25 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Then you'd have the conference championships decided by silly tiebreakers where you end up with a team that clearly wasn't the best getting the automatic bid. E.g., 2025 Alabama.


You mean we would start to have an argument about who the best 12 teams actually are again. Like, is #13 really not top 12? Instead of watching the number 24th and 19th ranked team push much better teams out? What a shame that would be.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter