Started By
Message
I’m sorry, IDC if it fits the letter of the law
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:47 pm
Face mask to face mask with a shove to the chest & the guy doesn’t even leave his feet is pussy shite targeting.
I mean I’ve got no love for the newcomers in the conference, but we have got to do something about ejecting players from games for incidental / non-flagrant contact.
It’s fkn ridiculous.
ETA: (OU vs Mizz)
I mean I’ve got no love for the newcomers in the conference, but we have got to do something about ejecting players from games for incidental / non-flagrant contact.
It’s fkn ridiculous.
ETA: (OU vs Mizz)
This post was edited on 11/22/25 at 1:48 pm
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:48 pm to DeathByTossDive225
Preaching to the choir.
Mostly. There are some figs though who think it's a good rule.
Mostly. There are some figs though who think it's a good rule.
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:49 pm to DeathByTossDive225
It’s soft. But by rule it’s targeting unfortunately.
ETA: I don’t like it. At all
ETA: I don’t like it. At all
This post was edited on 11/22/25 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:51 pm to DeathByTossDive225
So launching himself headfirst is not targeting? He lead with his head.
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:53 pm to TXTiger81
quote:
But by rule it’s targeting unfortunately.
I get that. The rule needs to be updated.
That play is not comparable to someone blindside spearing a receiver in the temple with the crown of the helmet & they shouldn’t be treated equivalently.
If you are going to eject players, it needs to be a system like there is in basketball where severity / risk / intent are considered & tiered penalty applied accordingly.
The current rule is stupid. You can have player safety without forcing this frustrating overly subjective BS on everyone.
This post was edited on 11/22/25 at 1:55 pm
Popular
Back to top
4






