Started By
Message
Randle cost LSU the #1 ranking today (maybe)
Posted on 2/4/09 at 4:36 pm
Posted on 2/4/09 at 4:36 pm
This from another board:
"On this AMP footage interview with Randle after the commitment, he confirms that he would not have signed with LSU if Benton had signed with LSU. But if Benton had signed, they would have enough points to take number 1 recruiting class."
LINK
"On this AMP footage interview with Randle after the commitment, he confirms that he would not have signed with LSU if Benton had signed with LSU. But if Benton had signed, they would have enough points to take number 1 recruiting class."
LINK
9
Posted on 2/4/09 at 4:37 pm to BamaInHsv
I don't care. Randle is a stud and the #1 player in the state and the nation by some sites. Benton is a great player, but has been out of football for a year. I'll take Randle.
Posted on 2/4/09 at 4:41 pm to BamaInHsv
well I guess RR isn't getting a tshirt!!!!
Posted on 2/4/09 at 8:54 pm to BamaInHsv
Who cares.....we got the better guy both on and off the football field. Benton needed to go ..... he will probably be an academic casualty in a year anyway. 
Posted on 2/4/09 at 10:56 pm to BamaInHsv
benton signing/not signing would not affect LSU's points.
According to the formula, the third time a kid signs he will not count towards that teams points, unless it is a different team than he signed with previously.
According to the formula, the third time a kid signs he will not count towards that teams points, unless it is a different team than he signed with previously.
Posted on 2/4/09 at 11:47 pm to BamaInHsv
LSU is #1.
#1 per ESPN
#1 per Lemmings
[link=(#1 per Lemmings)]https://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/story/11339771[/link]
Alabama #1 on Rivals, but everyone knows the Rival's bias and the over-signing of the illiterate by Saban.
#1 per ESPN
#1 per Lemmings
[link=(#1 per Lemmings)]https://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/story/11339771[/link]
Alabama #1 on Rivals, but everyone knows the Rival's bias and the over-signing of the illiterate by Saban.
This post was edited on 2/4/09 at 11:48 pm
Posted on 2/4/09 at 11:49 pm to BamaInHsv
3 things:
1. Randle is better
2. Benton is a risk (grades)
3. Benton hasn't played in at least a year
1. Randle is better
2. Benton is a risk (grades)
3. Benton hasn't played in at least a year
Posted on 2/4/09 at 11:49 pm to BamaInHsv
fwiw id take randle and the number 2 ranking on rivals over not getting him and being number 1
Posted on 2/5/09 at 9:03 am to BamaInHsv
quote:
BamaInHsv
Randle cost LSU the #1 ranking today (maybe)
This from another board:
"On this AMP footage interview with Randle after the commitment, he confirms that he would not have signed with LSU if Benton had signed with LSU. But if Benton had signed, they would have enough points to take number 1 recruiting class."
Dude, if Janzen Jackson signs with LSU, LSU's class will be back at #1 again. And we are already #1 in other recruitin polls, even without Jackson.
Posted on 2/5/09 at 9:07 am to BamaInHsv
Wait a minute ? So this is saying Benton > Randle ? This theory doesn't make much sense.
This all just proves what I am trying to convey in another thread. Fine with me. I think Randle will be a much better fit than Benton.
This all just proves what I am trying to convey in another thread. Fine with me. I think Randle will be a much better fit than Benton.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News