Started By
Message

re: Honest discussion about NIL. Would love to hear thoughts.

Posted on 4/24/24 at 10:13 am to
Posted by BevoBucks
H-town
Member since Dec 2022
4747 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 10:13 am to
quote:

I'm not completely against NIL, but I don't like how it's working now. It seems completely one sided, and I wonder when booster fatigue will set in, and maybe that needs to happen sooner rather than later.


The only route to reintroduce rules are the few SEC/B1G programs who can afford to breaking away, classifying players as employees & collectively bargaining with unions. I don’t like it, but haven’t seen any other model that will stand up in court. It’s that, or go be a fan of a smaller school which is still somewhat amateur sports.
Posted by twk
Wichita Falls, Texas
Member since Jul 2011
2237 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 10:56 am to
quote:

The only route to reintroduce rules are the few SEC/B1G programs who can afford to breaking away, classifying players as employees & collectively bargaining with unions. I don’t like it, but haven’t seen any other model that will stand up in court. It’s that, or go be a fan of a smaller school which is still somewhat amateur sports.
Collective bargaining will not solve the NIL problem. No sport that has collective bargaining limits what athletes can earn in sponsorships and such because it would be an anti-trust violation. Think about it. Imagine the NBA telling LeBron you can only earn $X in sponsorships.

The only way to get around this problem is for Congress to pass an anti-trust exemption of some sort for college athletics. That seems very unlikely.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter