Started By
Message
re: New Texas A&M AD and Big10
Posted on 4/26/24 at 3:56 pm to PerrillouxToTexas
Posted on 4/26/24 at 3:56 pm to PerrillouxToTexas
quote:
Aggies would rather commit program suicide than face Texas again. Absolute pussies
1. we have a winning record vs you since the modern era (you know, after the south quit having all-white teams, scholarship limits came into being, and a&m quit being an all-male military college.
2. we wanted to kepp playing our series after we left for SEC- texas refused. DeLoss Dodds pussy clearly on record.
3. We truly would like nothing to fo with you douche bags, mich fun as it is kickin your arse. We've warned the SEC what you're like as a conf mate- ask Arky, Mizzou, Nebraska, Colorado and half the old SWC teams. they'll find out soon enough.
4. I do believe A&M will end up in B10, but there is going to be one huge diff- it will be a contractual right to veto that crazy stalker texas from ever being admitted to B10.
that will be quite nice, as will the extra $$ and the fair officiating. (talking to u, bama).
5
Posted on 4/26/24 at 3:59 pm to truth22
Aggy almost as bad at controlling the narrative as CNN
Posted on 4/26/24 at 5:16 pm to truth22
quote:
we have a winning record vs you since
If you have to put this in a point you’re making, you’ve lost the argument. It’s such a “little bro” thing to cherry pick time frames
Posted on 4/26/24 at 5:18 pm to truth22
quote:And what is A&M going to do when the B10 says “frick y’all” and allows them in if they want? What conference will y’all run to? The SEC?
it will be a contractual right to veto that crazy stalker texas from ever being admitted to B10.
This post was edited on 4/26/24 at 5:19 pm
Posted on 4/26/24 at 5:45 pm to truth22
quote:
1. we have a winning record vs you since the modern era (you know, after the south quit having all-white teams, scholarship limits came into being, and a&m quit being an all-male military college.
I just did the math. The ONLY years aTm can claim leading the series are since ‘83, ‘84 and ‘85. They led by at most, 2 games, if you go back to ‘84. If you use ‘86 as the year, the series is even, and anytime more recent the edge goes to UT. If you go to ‘82, it’s even again, and Texas starts to dominate once you go back further.
So to get this straight, the aTm fan can say the Ags have a winning record since ‘83, ‘84, or ‘85, and that’s it.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 6:34 pm to truth22
quote:
3. We truly would like nothing to fo with you douche bags, mich fun as it is kickin your arse. We've warned the SEC what you're like as a conf mate- ask Arky, Mizzou, Nebraska, Colorado and half the old SWC teams. they'll find out soon enough.
TAMU: 5-11 vs. Texas in the Big 12
Mizzou: 2-7 vs. Texas in the Big 12
Nebraska: 1-9 vs. Texas in the Big 12
Colorado: 3-7 vs. Texas in the Big 12
Arky: 19-54 vs. Texas in SWC
Tough to say why those teams wouldn't like us.
quote:
4. I do believe A&M will end up in B10, but there is going to be one huge diff- it will be a contractual right to veto that crazy stalker texas from ever being admitted to B10.
This is fricking sad and pitiful. You can't possibly be so delusional to believe that any conference would block Texas in favor of Texas A&M. That's like believing a conference would keep Michigan out because Michigan State asked them. You are not important.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News