Started By
Message

re: Clemson joins FSU in ACC Lawsuit

Posted on 3/20/24 at 1:41 pm to
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
38011 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

People say that, but I don't think it's relevant anymore. The networks/streaming services are national.

I'm in Louisiana and an LSU fan,... I watch Clemson because they're known. I watch Ohio State and Oklahoma because they're generally quite good.

I haven't watched a Virginia team since Michael Vick was at Tech, and haven't paid attention to any NC team since the early 80's (with LT and Kelvin Bryant). You add them to the SEC, and all you get are teams you expect a W against when you play.

That's not how TV markets work.

TV markets, 90% of the metric, is geographically determined .... in other words, by footprint.

Advertisers and marketers don't care about the scatterings ..... they want the 10 to 8 ring on the target where most of the birdshot will hit. Everything else is gravy.

Few people understand how regionally targeted ad feeds are these day. No longer does every add fed go national ... there is always a certain amount of inventory alloted for regional specific ads.

Virginia and North Carolina are two markets that the SEC has long coveted .... at least as part of Roy Kramer's great vision. He was sure, that one day, the SEC would dominate both of those markets both from a TV footprint perspective AND and talent perspective (academically and athletically).

Of course, Mr Kramer never imagined the level of wokeness that would have to be overcome from both flagship universities which, fwiw, is part of the SEC's lexicon and mandate in modern times. However, from a cultural perspective, NC State and Va Tech would be a better fit in terms of sheer athletic contributions over the long haul.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20567 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

That's not how TV markets work.

TV markets, 90% of the metric, is geographically determined .... in other words, by footprint.
As I said, I don't think that's relevant anymore.

As we go more to a streaming setup, people are going to order services (including ESPN) 'as needed'. The money will come from the subscriptions, not the advertising. They need content, and more people will pay to see Texas vs Clemson, than to see Maryland vs UVA. There will be CFB junkies in Big 10 country who will order ESPN just to watch premium SEC games. They will likely keep it all season for those weekly matchups.
There's a few Big 10 matchups, but not a ton; not enough to encourage SEC (or Big 12) viewers to keep a Big 10 package all season. Might wanna watch Ohio State/Michigan/Oregon/Penn State matchups, but the rest is filler; either boring teams on both sides, or a boring team getting waxed by a good one.

That's the model we're moving to. The more elite teams (such as, yes, Clemson or Oklahoma, with a relatively small footprint, but a big national presence), the more you can market to the nation and keep subscriptions OUTSIDE the footprint.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter