re: Clemson joins FSU in ACC Lawsuit

quote:

---

Sorry, but using those words to describe the league that let in Texas is laughable. I don't want FSU or Clemson, but don't give me this brotherhood shite. It's all about the money.

---

You're correct ... it IS about the money and both Texas and Oklahoma increases our footprint, are flagship universities in their states ... and they're national, traditional, brands. They both offer well rounded overall athletic departments that bring mulitple additional national championship contender programs into the league.

Increased footprint ..... flagship universities ..... more national championships in various sports for the league.

Neither FSU or CU brings any of that.

Matter of fact, both of them would take a competitive dive, in this league, when forced to compete against our overall schedules. And then the league would be stuck carrying them in the long haul.

Name two sports, for each school, that they would win national championships in .... and don't type "football." Because their football championships are over if they were to enter this league.

Two non football sports. Name them. Anything. Tiddly winks, whatever.

Because every other school in this conference is either a Founding Member OR ... they're a flagship university, that increased the footprint of the conference, that brings/brought more national championships to the conference.

You can name two each for both Texas and Oklahoma. You can't do it for FSU or CU.

Now .... do you want to add FSU and CU to the conference for their men's lacrosse and soccer prowess (if you can call it that)?