Started By
Message
re: The ONLY reason I have had a live TV package the last few years was for sports. No more.
Posted on 3/3/24 at 2:19 pm to Ag Zwin
Posted on 3/3/24 at 2:19 pm to Ag Zwin
ESPN is planning to offer a streaming package. Price point will be critical. It'd have to be at least half the cost of the Sling package to be a legitimate option. All ESPN networks for $10-15/mo...yeah, but I wouldn't pay more than that.
3
Posted on 3/3/24 at 2:26 pm to Chad4Bama
ESPN sorely needs to uograde their app.
It is hot garbage.
Why can Netflix have an amazing interface and nobody else can do it quite like them.
Everybody should just copy Netflix
It is hot garbage.
Why can Netflix have an amazing interface and nobody else can do it quite like them.
Everybody should just copy Netflix
Posted on 3/4/24 at 7:02 pm to Chad4Bama
quote:Honestly I would love that. I usually cancel my YouTube TV after basketball and football (although Kentucky sucking the last three years has allowed me to skip the end of basketball season)
ESPN is planning to offer a streaming package. Price point will be critical.
Doesn't Disney own both ESPN and Hulu Live TV. I would think they wouldn't want to compete with themselves.
Posted on 3/5/24 at 9:14 am to Chad4Bama
quote:If there's one thing you can pretty much guarantee, it's that it won't be a good deal. ESPN+ is already $11. Compare that service for $11 to what you get from Peacock for $6.
ESPN is planning to offer a streaming package. Price point will be critical. It'd have to be at least half the cost of the Sling package to be a legitimate option. All ESPN networks for $10-15/mo...yeah, but I wouldn't pay more than that.
It's genuinely laughable. ESPN+ was barely worth it at the initial $5. Since then they've more than doubled the price and done absolutely nothing to improve the service.
This post was edited on 3/5/24 at 9:20 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News