Started By
Message
re: On3 Sports Jesse Simonton
Posted on 1/31/24 at 5:10 pm to Smokeyone
Posted on 1/31/24 at 5:10 pm to Smokeyone
The NCAA is not coming after UT because Nico has a NIL deal. The issue stems from boosters allegedly providing impermissible benefits on behalf of UT for a recruit during the recruiting process.
The Alston case in reference does not discuss or even considered if a school could use NIL to recruit it just said the NCAA could not create any rule preventing NIL deals with players and third parties for NIL contracts. The case or the courts have given no indication that universities can violate NCAA recruiting rules including allowing NIL to be used as an enticement.
Again different issues here but the NCAA still has to prove what is being alleged is a violation. I was just pointing out that the Alston has no value as a reference here.
The Alston case in reference does not discuss or even considered if a school could use NIL to recruit it just said the NCAA could not create any rule preventing NIL deals with players and third parties for NIL contracts. The case or the courts have given no indication that universities can violate NCAA recruiting rules including allowing NIL to be used as an enticement.
Again different issues here but the NCAA still has to prove what is being alleged is a violation. I was just pointing out that the Alston has no value as a reference here.
1
Posted on 1/31/24 at 5:21 pm to TideWarrior
quote:
The NCAA is not coming after UT because Nico has a NIL deal. The issue stems from boosters allegedly providing impermissible benefits on behalf of UT for a recruit during the recruiting process.
Spyre flying Nico out to talk business is not an impermissible benefit.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News