Started By
Message
re: How many of you think the DeBoer hire was a good one?
Posted on 1/13/24 at 7:13 am to ronricks
Posted on 1/13/24 at 7:13 am to ronricks
quote:
DeBoer didn’t recruit as good as Lanning, Sark, or Riley. He was 6-0 against them. This obsession with recruiting rankings is really bizarre when you have a sample size like that.
He had a Heisman level QB for two seasons and the Pac-12 is a cakewalk in general.
3
Posted on 1/13/24 at 7:23 am to Stidham8
quote:
He had a Heisman level QB for two seasons and the Pac-12 is a cakewalk in general.
Texas isn’t in the PAC. That doesn’t explain how he was able to beat programs that out recruited him. Riley also had a Heisman winning QB. Something isn’t quite right so either the recruiting rankings were wrong or DeBoer just might be able to coach. Which is it?
Posted on 1/13/24 at 7:25 am to Stidham8
quote:
He had a Heisman level QB for two seasons and the Pac-12 is a cakewalk in general.
He also took a team full of Washington recruits and beat Texas.
Anything that's not Saban is a downgrade, but if I were an Alabama fan I'd be pretty happy.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 10:37 am to Stidham8
quote:
He had a Heisman level QB for two seasons
And who got him to come to Washington and made him a Heisman level QB?
quote:
and the Pac-12 is a cakewalk in general.
Was it a cakewalk for any team not named Washington? Arizona, ASU, Stanford, UCLA, etc, etc, etc, etc...was it a cakewalk for them?
This post was edited on 1/13/24 at 10:38 am
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News