Started By
Message
re: How many of you think the DeBoer hire was a good one?
Posted on 1/13/24 at 7:09 am to frogtown
Posted on 1/13/24 at 7:09 am to frogtown
quote:
Good hire yes. Will he recruit better than Saban(or Kirby), no.
DeBoer didn’t recruit as good as Lanning, Sark, or Riley. He was 6-0 against them. This obsession with recruiting rankings is really bizarre when you have a sample size like that.
4
Posted on 1/13/24 at 7:13 am to ronricks
quote:
DeBoer didn’t recruit as good as Lanning, Sark, or Riley. He was 6-0 against them. This obsession with recruiting rankings is really bizarre when you have a sample size like that.
He had a Heisman level QB for two seasons and the Pac-12 is a cakewalk in general.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 7:18 am to ronricks
Seeing Deboer’s recruiting at Washington makes me so happy! I’m excited he’s in charge of the program and deserves 6 seasons and a movie!
This post was edited on 1/13/24 at 7:19 am
Posted on 1/13/24 at 8:46 am to ronricks
quote:
DeBoer didn’t recruit as good as Lanning, Sark, or Riley. He was 6-0 against them. This obsession with recruiting rankings is really bizarre when you have a sample size like that.
Poor reading comprehension by you. Just said I believe he won't be able to recruit like Kirby and Saban. Most would agree with that assessment. I could be wrong.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 9:00 am to ronricks
quote:
DeBoer didn’t recruit as good as Lanning, Sark, or Riley. He was 6-0 against them. This obsession with recruiting rankings is really bizarre when you have a sample size like that.
That’s not gonna work in the SEC week in and week out. You should know better than that, and yes, that’s not only a small sample size, but it’s an irrelevant sample set altogether.
The SEC grind is different totally.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News