Started By
Message
re: PowerMizzou DC hotboard
Posted on 1/8/24 at 5:30 pm to MizzouFan13
Posted on 1/8/24 at 5:30 pm to MizzouFan13
It would be bad to offer that much to any but a few very sought after assistants. There was added value in the consistency of keeping Baker which won't be there with any other coach.
Ideally an aggressive DC with ties to existing recruiting grounds, who fits the style well of what we are doing.
Part of why I'm fine hiring within is that we should be able to keep all assistants on the defense. A new person might want their own choice of DL or LB coaches, or might mesh poorly with ones we have.
Ideally an aggressive DC with ties to existing recruiting grounds, who fits the style well of what we are doing.
Part of why I'm fine hiring within is that we should be able to keep all assistants on the defense. A new person might want their own choice of DL or LB coaches, or might mesh poorly with ones we have.
2
Posted on 1/8/24 at 6:08 pm to deputyfife
Problem is are we looking solely to max what we have this year in complimenting the offense or looking to the future?
Or do we get the most aggressive attacking D guy to max not only next season but beyond?
Tough question to decide.
Or do we get the most aggressive attacking D guy to max not only next season but beyond?
Tough question to decide.
Posted on 1/9/24 at 7:11 am to deputyfife
quote:
Part of why I'm fine hiring within is that we should be able to keep all assistants on the defense. A new person might want their own choice of DL or LB coaches, or might mesh poorly with ones we have.
The issue is if the rumor about baker bring peoples with him to LSU, the new DC will already have to either bring in a safeties coach or a DL coach depending on their background so i think if we go make a splash hire, we will have some remaining staff and some new. Even if we hire within, we potentially have to fill 2 position roles.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News