re: The game that started the Saban/Bama dynasty

The problem is there is a general definition of the term "dynasty,"

You really can't debate the meaning of a word.

The meaning of the term "dynasty" as it pertains to sports is 3 titles within 4 years for a purest, but you COULD DEBATE a dynasty with 3 titles within five years.

This makes next season really important if Bama wins a natty this year. If Bama wins next season then the Bama dynasty era continues and can be traced back over a decade which is bonkers.

If Georgia wins they would have an argument that our dynasty has ended and theirs has begun.

If Georgia doesn't win next year then they are just Clemson before they fell off a cliff like most flash-in-the-pans.

I'm actually betting Georgia falls off similar to Clemson because they are already showing cracks, and next season will be the first time Kirby has ever played a schedule similar to the ones Bama has had to play to get to a title. They wont win another title within the "dynasty" window IMO.

Back to the Richt days for the dogs. Good football team that never wins the big game.

They shouldn't have gotten a mulligan after being destroyed by Bama in the SECCG- they tried to georgia there season up in that game, but mulligan.

They got insanely lucky that Ohio State had a complete meltdown, and then they played TCU of all people for the weakest title game of the modern era.

The free pass to the SECCG through the weak arse SEC lEast is OVER